Can Journals Have Dual Corresponding Authors?
Research collaboration is a key aspect of scientific publishing, and it often involves multiple authors contributing to a single study. In some cases, the contributions of two authors may be considered equally significant, leading to the question of whether journals can accommodate dual corresponding authors.
Traditionally, a corresponding author is responsible for handling communications between the journal and the co-authors, as well as addressing queries from readers or other researchers. This role is crucial for ensuring effective dissemination of the research findings and facilitating scientific discussions. However, having two corresponding authors can pose challenges in terms of coordination and responsibility distribution.
One of the primary concerns with dual corresponding authors is the potential for communication breakdowns. Journals rely on the corresponding author to provide accurate and timely responses to editorial queries, and having two authors share this responsibility could lead to confusion or delays. Additionally, assigning clear roles and responsibilities to each corresponding author may be challenging, especially if their areas of expertise or availability differ.
Despite these challenges, there are potential benefits to having dual corresponding authors. For one, it can symbolize a truly collaborative effort, highlighting the equal contributions of the authors. This approach may be particularly relevant in interdisciplinary studies where multiple experts from different fields come together to address complex research questions. Moreover, having two corresponding authors can potentially increase the visibility and accessibility of the study, as it allows for broader networks of contacts and expertise to be involved in the communication process.
However, it is important to note that the guidelines for corresponding authorship may vary across different journals and disciplines. Some journals may explicitly allow for dual corresponding authors, while others may prefer a single corresponding author to streamline the communication process. Authors considering this approach should carefully review the policies of their target journals and consult with the editorial team to ensure that the arrangement is acceptable.
Another consideration for journals is the potential impact of dual corresponding authors on issues such as authorship credit and accountability. Ensuring proper attribution of contributions and accountability for the research findings is essential for upholding the integrity of the publication process. Journals may need to establish clear guidelines for cases where dual corresponding authors are involved, outlining how roles and responsibilities will be managed to avoid any ambiguity or disputes.
